Journal Home
Search for

Volume 108, Issue 5, Pages 867-872 (May 2008)


View previous. 27 of 36 View next.

Protein Intake Estimated by Weighed Diet Records in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Misreporting and Intra-Individual Variability Using 24-Hour Nitrogen Output as Criterion Standard

Juliana dos Santos Vaz, RD, Miriam Bittencourt, RD, Jussara Carnevale Almeida, RD, Jorge Luiz Gross, MD, PhD, Mirela Jobim De Azevedo, MD, PhD, Themis Zelmanovitz, MD, PhDCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Accepted 5 November 2007.

Abstract 

In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), the factors associated with under- or overreporting of protein intake in nutrition assessment tools, as well as the variability of diet records, have not been fully established. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate factors associated with under- or overreporting of protein intake and its variability in patients with type 2 DM. Protein intake was estimated in 205 patients (aged 59.8±9.6 years) using 3-day weighed diet records and 24-hour nitrogen output (criterion standard). Twenty-three patients repeated the 3-day weighed diet records three times. Clinical, nutrition, and lifestyle evaluations were performed. Coefficients of variation were calculated for protein intake. Factors associated with under- and overreporting were assessed using multivariate logistic regression models. Coefficients of variation for protein intake estimated by weighed diet records or nitrogen output were similar (11.9% vs 11.3%; P>0.05). Using Beaton's formula, a difference of 16.5% in protein intake between two 3-day weighed diet records was acceptable. The lowest A1c test tertile (≤6.9%) was associated with protein intake underreporting (odds ratio [OR]=0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.16 to 0.99; P=0.046] after adjustment for sex, age, employment status, and living alone. Male sex (OR=6.66; 95% CI: 2.08 to 22.07; P=0.002), A1c test (OR=1.29; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.64; P=0.036), and body mass index (OR=0.89; 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.994; P=0.039), adjusted for physical and employment status, education, and preparing one's own meals, were associated with overreporting. In conclusion, in patients with type 2 DM, a difference >16.5% in protein intake between two 3-day weighed diet records should be interpreted as a true discrepancy. Poor glucose control and male sex increase the chance of inaccurate 3-day weighed diet records.

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Themis Zelmanovitz, MD, PhD, Serviço de Endocrinologia do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, Prédio 12, 4° andar, 90035-903, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

PII: S0002-8223(08)00331-3

doi:10.1016/j.jada.2008.03.022


View previous. 27 of 36 View next.