Journal Home
Search for

Volume 109, Issue 12, Pages 2010-2016 (December 2009)


View previous. 10 of 29 View next.

Psychological Variables Associated with Weight Loss in Obese Patients Seeking Treatment at Medical Centers

Riccardo Dalle Grave, MD, Simona Calugi, DPsy, Francesco Corica, MD, Silvia Di Domizio, RD, Giulio Marchesini, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, QUOVADIS Study Group

Accepted 19 June 2009.

Abstract 

Background

The identification of process and treatment variables associated with successful weight loss could be a pivotal strategy to reduce attrition and improve effectiveness of dietary treatment in obesity and could help find new therapeutic strategies.

Objective

The aim of study is to identify the psychological predictors of weight loss in patients with obesity compliant to continuous treatment at medical centers.

Design

Longitudinal observation of a large cohort of obese subjects entering weight-loss programs in the years 2000-2002.

Subjects/setting

Five hundred obese patients who completed 12-month weight-loss treatment by Italian medical centers offering different programs (78.8% females; age 46.2±10.8 years; body mass index [BMI; calculated as kg/m2] 37.3±5.6).

Main outcome measured

Measurements were obtained at baseline and after a 12-month weight-loss program. Psychological distress, binge eating, body uneasiness, and attitude toward eating were evaluated by self-administered questionnaires (Symptom Check List-90, Binge Eating Scale, Body Uneasiness Test, and Eating Inventory [Dietary Restraint, Disinhibition, and Hunger]), together with BMI changes. Weight-loss expectations and primary motivation for seeking treatment (health or improving appearance) were also recorded.

Results

At follow-up, mean percent weight loss was similar in males and females. Both hierarchical regression and logistic regression analysis revealed that increased dietary restraint and decreased disinhibition were the only independent psychological predictors of BMI change after controlling for age, sex, and baseline BMI (5% weight loss at 12 months: Eating Inventory Restraint (odds ratio [OR]: 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09 to 1.21) and Disinhibition (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.99); 10% weight loss: Restraint (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.16) and Disinhibition (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.98). Adjustment for centers did not change the results.

Conclusion

Successful weight loss was associated with increased dietary restraint and reduced disinhibition in obese patients seeking weight-loss treatment in several medical centers throughout Italy.

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Giulio Marchesini, MD, Unit of Clinical Dietetics, Alma Mater University of Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola, Via Massarenti, 9, I-40138 Bologna, Italy

PII: S0002-8223(09)01559-4

doi:10.1016/j.jada.2009.09.011


View previous. 10 of 29 View next.